A WATER utility company has been handed a total of £17,000 of fines after being found guilty of seven offences relating to work carried on a road last year.
The fines were against Wales & West Utilities Limited and totalled £17,000.00 with costs of £4,895.25 and a surcharge of £190.00 awarded against them.
One key offence was that the company falsely notified the council of a fictional gas leak in order to apply for an emergency work permit and to start working earlier.
The case, heard at North Somerset Magistrates on Wednesday 14 April, was about a series of offences at Loveridge Lane, in Tatworth near Chard.
Wales & West Utilities Limited was found guilty of seven offences, which includes:
- Misleading Somerset County Council in failing to use its best endeavours under s.60(3) to apply for a legal road closure in order to carry out its street works when the permit expressly stated a road closure was necessary.
- Falsely notified Somerset County Council of a fictional gas leak at a separate location on the street in order to be eligible to apply for an Immediate (Emergency) Works permit and start the proposed works earlier.
- Failing to adequately sign, light and guard a work site, contrary to Section 65 of The New Roads and Street Works Act 1991.
- Carrying out street works without a valid permit, contrary to regulation 19 of the Traffic Management Permit Scheme (England) Regulations 2007.
- Failure to notify the street authority of a completed reinstatement and the placing of apparatus in the street, contrary to s.70(4A) and s.79(4) of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991, respectively.
- Failure to use its best endeavours to cooperate with the street authority by registering a reinstatement at another location, separate from where the works were carried out.
These offences took place at Loveridge Lane, in Tatworth on 15 October 2021.
In summing up the judge noted the early guilty pleas, they stated that the company used deceptive tactics in order to circumvent its duties and obligations under the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991.
The court gave full credit for the early guilty pleas and took account of the previous good record of the company in carrying out 10,000 street works in the country and the fact that the company have since held extremely serious talks as to its conduct and provided extra training to its employees.
Interim Economic and Community Infrastructure Deputy Director at Somerset County Council, David Carter, said: “We welcome the District Judge’s ruling. This case demonstrates the importance of procedure and process and when ignored can lead to unnecessary disruption on our roads.
“Without knowledge of street works being carried out, we are unable to ensure emergency services can be diverted and there is no statutory guarantee period in having to remedy any defects – which leaves the Council having to step in at the expense of taxpayers’ money. We cannot let this happen without consequences.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel